logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018.3.13.선고 2017도14618 판결
변호사법위반
Cases

2017Do14618 Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2017No216 Decided August 18, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

March 13, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s prosecution of this case

We affirm the judgment of conviction of facts. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the law of logic and experience

No error exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of the rules or misapprehending the relevant legal principles.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

shall be determined.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Jo Hee-de

Justices Kim Jae-tae

Justices Kim Jae-in

Justices Min You-sook of the District Court

arrow