logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.08.29 2018누39173
시정명령, 과징금납부명령 및 감면신청 기각 처분 취소의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s order to pay penalty surcharges in attached Form 1(2) as a resolution C against the Plaintiff in 2014 and 2015.

Reasons

(b) The term "certification" means the time it has been granted;

[1] According to the 2012 Presidential Decree, the Plaintiff 1 and the 5th C&L 10, the 5th C&L 201, the 15th C&L 1, the 15th C&L 1, the 15th C&L 1, the 5th C&L 201, the 15th C&L 1, the 15th C&L 2, the 15th C&L 1, the 14th C&L 201, the 5th C&L 1, the 14th C&L 14, the 14th C&L 14, the 5th C&L 201, the 5th C&L 1, the 14th C&L 2, the 14th C&L 14th M&L 1, the 14th C&L 14, the 14th C&L 14th of the 2014.

In other words, if the bid price exceeds the estimated price below the estimated price, it will decline regardless of whether or not the qualification examination is conducted.

The low-level business operator examined the eligibility in the order of the business operator, and the evaluation is required according to the scale of the estimated price with the aggregate of the evaluation of performance and the evaluation of bidding prices.

Written Actions and Evaluations

The allocation by lawsuit is different, and the scale of construction is at least 20 million won but less than 300 million won based on the estimated price.

arrow