1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court has stated with respect to this case are as follows: ① Reasons for the judgment of the first instance court

B. 2) Of the main sentence of paragraph (b), the part concerning each real estate listed in Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 9 of [Attachment No. 1] among the main sentence of paragraph (b) "trade in the name of H on August 28, 2002 in the name of H on August 3, 2002" shall read "trade in the name of H on August 9, 2002 with respect to the real estate listed in paragraph (8) above, as "trade in the name of H on July 18, 200, with respect to the real estate listed in paragraph (9) No. 9 on August 28, 2002, trade, and trade on August 3, 202, 202," and Article 3-3

(e) in paragraph (1) (Nos. 14 and 22), with the deletion of paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (3), set aside as paragraphs (1) (i), (ii), and (iii).

(e) 2) In addition, paragraph 3) “each of the 635,127,470 Won” shall be deemed “each of the 639,239,724 Won” and the reasons for the first instance judgment in paragraph 2(a) below

(b) paragraphs (3) through (d) (Articles 13, 16, and 14, 20, 3-2, 2-2, 3-3, 2,

F. 3) (b) through (g) (Article 420) (Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is the same as the grounds for the judgment of the first instance, in addition to the fact that (a) through (b) (Articles 20 to 3) (Article 20) are dismissed, and (b) is additionally determined as to a dispute newly submitted by the Defendant to this court under Article 2(c) below.

B. In particular, in light of the assertion that the plaintiffs and the defendant emphasized up to this court, namely, the plaintiffs' assertion that each real estate listed in the list Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 9 of the plaintiffs' donated property list No. 1, 4, 8, and 9 of the plaintiffs' claim No. 1 in the judgment of first instance, is donated from the deceased, it is difficult to view that the deceased donated the real estate itself or the acquisition fund thereof, even if the materials submitted to this court were presented, even if the materials were presented to the court. The defendant's "the plaintiff received 300 square meters of each of the

'The argument' is the argument.