1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance which cited most of the judgments on this case is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts to be added in accordance with Paragraph (2) below and the part to be newly determined under Paragraph (3) (Evidence submitted to the court of first instance). Thus, even if the evidence presented to the court was presented in the evidence of the court of first instance, as the service contract of this case was rescinded by the delivery of the preparatory document dated July 4, 2017, which contains the Plaintiff’s expression of intent of rescission according to the Defendant’s refusal of performance, instead of the Plaintiff’s non-performance of obligation, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff with the service cost resulting from the performance of additional services, and the part of fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance which concluded

2. Article 1-(c) of the part concerning the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance which is dismissed or added to “after construction as a business operator” (Article 4-18), which means “after the selection of a business operator as a business operator,”

A. (1) Notice of 2016. and Notice of 2016.” (No. 6. et al.) (Notice of the cancellation of the instant service contract according to the resolution of the General Assembly of Members around June 3, 2016) 3

A. (1) Paragraph (1) of the same Article, “compensation shall be made for damages following the cancellation of the contract” (Article 15 of the 6th page 15 shall be adjusted, as well as compensation for damages arising from nonperformance of the contract)

(a) 1,138,610,00 won “1,138,610,000 won” (Class 7 2) and “243,947,00 won” (Class 7 3) as “1,115,72,080 won” and “243,947,000 won” (Class 7 3 229,188,960 won);

(a)Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Convention on the Aggravated Punishment, Etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (No. 7, No. 4, No. 5, No. 16, and No. 17) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (No. 7, No. 16, and No. 17);

(a)(2)(3) “Service” (Nos. 8, 7, and 8) shall be deemed to be “service” and shall be deemed to be “service”;

(b)(3)(b) by striking 3 the phrase “unfair or unjustifiable” (asp. 14)(asp. 3).

(b) 4) "A is the defendant" in paragraph (a).