The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment for a term of one year and two months, confiscation under No. 1, and additional collection of KRW 450,00) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that the defendant was not guilty of the same kind of offense is favorable.

However, the crime of this case was committed by aiding and abetting the so-called fraud crime, which is a planned and organized crime, by taking many unspecified persons as the object of the crime, even though the defendant committed only the part of the role of collecting and remitting cash.

Even if it is necessary to play an essential role in the realization of criminal benefits, the responsibility for the crime is not easy.

The damage amount of this case is not much than KRW 55 million, and the defendant also acquired allowances of KRW 450,000 due to the crime of this case.

In addition, in full view of the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and the new circumstances or special changes in circumstances that may be reflected in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.