The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) was too unreasonable, but the instant crime was committed by an unspecified number of persons as a subject of the crime, and aiding and abetting the so-called scaming crime, which is a fraud crime planned and organized. Although the Defendant committed only the part of the remittance and withdrawal of cash.

In light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the defendant did an essential role in realizing criminal benefits, and in particular, the defendant did not know even though he did not commit the crime of this case even though he did not commit a repeated crime due to the same fraud, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed on the defendant is too unreasonable on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, even though he did not consider the circumstances that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the phrase "1. previous records" in the summary of the evidence of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected by adding "the statement of the suspect's protocol of interrogation of the accused prepared by the