2014Nu2128 Revocation of disposition to designate an erosion control area, etc.

Australia Construction Corporation

The head of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap5268 decided January 16, 2014

October 10, 2014

October 31, 2014

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of designating land for erosion control on December 22, 201 and disposition of designating land for erosion control on January 2, 201 with respect to land for erosion control on December 22, 201 with respect to land for 20-2 forest land in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul and the area for natural disaster control is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

This decision is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges of the presiding judge;

Judges Dokman

Judges Kim Yong-han