logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.01.07 2015고단1825
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 700,000 to a fine for a crime of violating road traffic law in the Seo-gu District Court’s branch on June 10, 2008. On August 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a crime of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) in the Seo-gu District Court’s branch branch on August 22, 2014. The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year.

[Criminal Facts]

1. The Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking), driven a c gallon with alcohol content of about 2 km from the front road of the “U.S.,” located in the Goari-ri Eup in the Ganbuk-gun, Gan-gun, Gan-gun, Gan-gun, Gan-gun, Gan-gun, Gan-gun, Lan-gun, Gan-gun, Lan-si, Lan-si, Lan-si, Lan-si, Lan-si, L

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with a gallon course for the purpose of violating the Road Traffic Act (not after accidents).

On October 4, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, as indicated in the preceding port around 22:20, while driving it, and led the two-lane road in front of the “E cafeteria” D in the Gyeongbuk-gun, North Korean Peninsula, to bypass approximately 30 to 40 km each hour, depending on the two-lanes of the front line, from the front line of the police box to the front line of the university.

Since there is a long distance intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing speed and driving safely by checking the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the front city, and the Defendant obtained a pedestrian signal apparatus installed in the safety zone on the left-hand side of the front-hand side of the said vehicle as a part before the left-hand part of the said vehicle, and damaged the above pedestrian signal apparatus to have an amount equivalent to KRW 434,00,000, and did not take necessary measures by leaving the Defendant’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

arrow