A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seo-gu District Court Branch on October 2, 2008. On November 27, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime at the same court.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On February 23, 2017, Defendant 2 driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.205% alcohol concentration from the section of 2 km up to the front road to the intersection of the main office in the same Eup/Myeon in the funeral hall, which is located in the long-term Ri in the Eup/Myeon, in consideration of the fact that there was two or more times the history of punishment for violating the prohibition of drinking driving as above, and around 00:31 on February 23, 2017, Defendant 2 driven the vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.205%.

2. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), as indicated in paragraph (1), was driving a car by driving the car above around 00:31, and, at the same time, the Defendant continued one lane in front of the intersection of the main road under the Eup/Myeon management in consideration of the price for the principal road in front of the road in front of the intersection in the Eup/Myeon.

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the vehicle by driving the vehicle, such as putting the front line and the right and the right and the right of the driver, accurately operating the operation and the steering gear, and accurately observing the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, was driving while driving in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol in a state of 0.205% alcohol concentration in blood, as stated in paragraph 1, and, as a result, the Defendant was under normal course of driving in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol.

C (A) Operation D 49 years of age) Roster on the left-hand side of the cargo vehicle was received as the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above work performance.