A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2018, at the front of "C" located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) took care of the reporter F while he received a report (no 2575) and sent the report, and the circumstances leading up to the D District Unit of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station, the Defendant took care of the reporter F; and (b) took care of the foregoing circumstances, and (c) took care of E, the Defendant took care of the reporter F; and (d) took care of the report, and (e) took care of the report, the Defendant took care of the reporter F; and (e) took care of the report, and (e) took care of E.g., whether: (e., whether he was fson; (b) whether he is a police officer of the weather; (c) whether he is a police officer of the weather; (d) when he was snicked with the franite’s bomb; and (e) took care of the e-mail’s face once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the police of E (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. A written statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on shooting images;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the range of the recommended sentence] of the obstruction of the performance of official duties [the scope of the recommended sentence] basic area (the scope of the recommended sentence] of the first category of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the obstruction of the performance of official duties/the coercion of the official duties]

2. Whether to suspend the execution (general reasons for such suspension) - positive: Serious reflection.

3. The defendant's criminal act of making a sentence of sentence is deemed to interfere with his/her execution of duties by taking the fat of a police officer's fat, who has taken a bath for acting as an acting engineer and prevented him/her from wearing his/her fat once, and the character of the crime is very good in light of the situation and attitude of the criminal act in which the face of a police officer dispatched upon receipt of a report to the defendant is directly charged for drinking;

The defendant may, even after arrest, pose a threat to police officers, etc., even after the crime is committed.