logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2014.10.29 2014고단81
제3자뇌물취득
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for one year and three months, respectively.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, conducted on May 31, 2006, the fourth local election of Dong-si was held as a member of the Gun Council in the constituency of E-Gun F and G in the constituency of E-Gun, and the fifth E-Gun Council member in the constituency of E-Gun. On June 2, 2010, the fifth local election implemented on June 2, 2010, was held as a member of the 6th E-Gun Council in the same constituency. In addition, a person who was elected as a Vice-Chairperson of each E-Gun Council member from January 29, 2010 to June 30, 2010 and from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2012.

Defendant

B From around 1988 to around 16,00, approximately KRW 16,00, and approximately KRW 3,000 of swine cattle farms, which were “J farm,” was operated. On June 2, 2010, the fifth nationwide election of Dong si si si si, which was implemented on June 2, 2010, made efforts to get the said K to be elected as a candidate for the E-Gun candidate.

1. Defendant A asserted that, in the process of deliberation on the budget bill of the 195 Eth Eth Eth Assembly (the first regular meeting) held from July 17, 2013 to August 18, 2013, Defendant A provided compensation for operating expenses, obstacles, etc. to the said J farm that was submitted to the Eth Office’s management strategy and jurisdiction with the basic support cost of KRW 12.22 billion in 23.5 billion in 2013 allocated to the Eth EthF region, and the removal of the farm is related to the Defendant’s local area, Defendant A strongly argued that, on the grounds that the budget bill of the “ livestock shed facility improvement project” in the “project cost” is related to the Defendant’s local area, Defendant A complained that it was unreasonable to implement the project in the process of deliberation, and that, on the grounds of his opposing opinion, Defendant A strongly presented the opinion of plenary session, such as “Chewing and drinking water dives.”

However, the total budget bill has been reduced by three affirmative votes and four opposing votes at the end of the 7th class of the members belonging to the "for example," and the budget bill has been reduced.

However, the above budget bill (3.3 billion won) that has been reduced in full as above was July 22, 2013.

arrow