1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from those alleged in the trial of first instance.

In addition, according to the evidence submitted up to the trial court, the plaintiff's injury and disease of this case occurred to the occupational department.

The judgment of the first instance court that cannot be deemed as a sudden aggravation of an existing disease due to natural progress or more is justifiable (as a result of the examination of the medical record of the head of the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance, according to the part of the judgment of the Seoul Medical Center of the first instance, it states that the Plaintiff’s cerebrovascular is only accepted by social norms, although the Plaintiff’s cerebrscular is an existing disease on the surface of the sea. However, according to the evaluation result, the Plaintiff’s cerebrscular is caused by the piracy, and there is no medical ground that the cause of the cerebrsculars is not verified accurately, but there is no medical ground that the cause of the psychotropics is caused by overwork or stress. Therefore, in light of such overall contents, it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s work and the disease of this case, although the Plaintiff’s circumstance is not supported by medical basis). Accordingly, it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s work and the disease of this case. The reasons for the judgment in this case are stated in the first instance judgment.

2. If so, the decision of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against it is without merit, and it is dismissed as per Disposition.