logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.26 2017누87922
국가유공자 등 비해당결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of partial dismissal as follows.

Therefore, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 6th 19th 6th 19th 19th 19th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th “the result of the request for the evaluation of the records of medical treatment” is as follows: “A evidence 6-2, B-5 through 8; the result of the request for the evaluation of the records to the director of the Seoul Medical Center of the first 1st 20th 20th 2nd 200

Part 7 14 "Written Examination of Public Official Pension Disability" shall be improved to "Written Examination of Ex Post Facto Disability".

7. The "this Court" in the 17th parallel act shall be deemed to be the "Court of First Instance".

In 7th 19th 7th 19th , the "horizontal signboard escape certificate and the credit forecast escape certificate" is "medical opinion that can be seen as a credit forecast escape certificate, different from the hived signboard escape certificate."

8 The 6th page "not verified" is presumed to be "not verified".

The 8th 9th 9th am "It is too reasonable that the symptoms have been performed in connection with the accident after the lapse of a considerable period of time after the hospitalization of one month after the accident (a period of about 8 months)," "It is difficult to conclude a direct and detailed causal relationship between the operation on the escape certificate of a protruding signboard that was performed after the discharge on December 2004 and the accident of this case, considering that the symptoms have been predicted to have been caused as a part of the flasium damage caused by the accident of this case, but immediately after the accident, the symptoms have not been serious since the Plaintiff's hospitalization form (a week after the hospitalization, 5 months after the hospitalization)."

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow