logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.07.19 2015고단1645
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(2015 order 1645, 2015 order 2045) [2045 order 2015 order 1645]

1. Around 2003, while importing and selling visual visibility from China, the Defendant is engaged in the business of importing visual visibility from China with the victim C, and the Defendant is engaged in the business of importing visual visibility from China, and the Defendant is engaged in the business of importing visual visibility from China and settling expenses, and the victim is in charge of the business of selling visual visibility in Korea, but the Defendant is in charge of the business of selling visual visibility from the sales revenue to 50 to 50 to the remaining profits.

Of that, the Defendant, when calculating the cost at the office No. 1204 of the Building D in Ansan-gu, Anyang-si on April 30, 2010, the Defendant: (a) calculated the 373 visual revenue amount of KRW 10,000 per one visual unit price, even if the 373 visual revenue amount was 31,734,308 won; and (b) calculated the 35,464,308 visual revenue amount as if the 3730,000 won was paid for the victim; and (c) used the 3333 times in the same way from April 30, 2010 to August 20, 2013 as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, such as the consumption of the 3730,000 won for personal purposes.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled another person's property while on duty.

2. Around September 29, 2014, at the same place as the above 1.1. paragraph, the Defendant told the victim E to the effect that “the Defendant would import visual visibility from a view of making an investment and give him/her reflect on the profit.”

However, the defendant was in excess of his/her obligation due to the failure of various businesses, such as online game businesses at the time, and even if he/she received money from the injured party, he/she had no intention or ability to import visibility and make profits.

The Defendant, as such, deceivings the victim, i.e., KRW 10 million in cash, and KRW 60 million in cash, i.e., KRW 50 million in early October 2014.

arrow