logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.08.12 2019고단1535
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 5, 2019, from around 19:00 to around 19:20 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) divided the card into seven by using card 52; (b) a person who first puts the card in accordance with the prescribed rules; (c) a person who first puts the card into a winner; and (d) a person who 1,000 won, 2,000 won, and 3,000 won, 40 won, and 4,000 won, and 4,000 won, and 4,000 won, are paid to the winners, respectively.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. (i) On February 5, 2019, around 19:30 on February 5, 2019, the Defendant was asked the police officer J of Seodaemun Police Station in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, about personal information, and the Defendant was under questioning of his/her personal information from the police officer J of the district, and the Defendant was under suspicion of the Defendant’s pro-friendly K, and the “verification” of the written confirmation without authority was written in the “verification” of the written confirmation of the suspect’s body confirmation of the arrested and detained suspect.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the K’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

Dodice Defendant submitted to the J, a police officer, a certificate stating the above forged signature at the time, at the time, at the place of paragraph (1) above, and a written confirmation of the suspect's body under arrest and detention, and exercised it.

B. On February 5, 2019, around 21:58, the Defendant: (i) received an investigation from a police officer L belonging to the police station in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul as a unification of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, as gambling case; (ii) followed the investigation by the police officer L belonging to the police station as if the Defendant was K, and (iii) stated “K” in the “statement” column of the suspect interrogation protocol without authority, and read it next to the investigation.

The defendant is entitled to exercise.

arrow