logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.22 2019가단540998
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants fall under the indication ② of the real estate to be delivered to the Plaintiff by each Defendant as indicated in the attached Table.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment project partnership that obtained approval for the establishment of a housing redevelopment project association on August 25, 2009 for the purpose of the housing redevelopment project (hereinafter “instant project”) whose project implementation district consisting of the housing redevelopment project district consisting of the area E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Plaintiff is the project implementer.

On September 6, 2008, the Suwon City announced the public perusal for designating the rearrangement zone for the instant project, and notified the Plaintiff of the project implementation of the instant project on June 15, 2012, and the project implementation authorization was publicly notified on June 18, 2012, and the management and disposal plan was approved on June 8, 2018 and was publicly notified on the same day.

The defendants occupy each of the above real estate as the owner of each of the above real estate specified in paragraph (2) of the indication of the real estate to be delivered to each defendant located within the business area of this case.

On September 23, 2019, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 76,200,000 as compensation for losses, and KRW 161,350,000 as compensation for losses under the above confinement ruling, respectively, by taking Defendant B and C as depositee on October 14, 2019, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants, the owners and occupants of each of the pertinent real estate indicated in paragraph (2) of the indication of the real estate to be delivered to each Defendant, are obligated to deliver each of the pertinent real estate to the Plaintiff who acquired the right of use

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.

arrow