beta
Text
1. The Defendants constitute each Defendant described in Section B, “A indicating real estate to be delivered to each Defendant,” as indicated in the attached Table to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff obtained authorization for the establishment of an association on May 28, 2010, for the purpose of improving the urban environment and improving the quality of residential life through the business of removing defective buildings on the land in the zone where the F 37,022.00 square meters is located and constructing a new building (hereinafter “instant improvement business”).
B. The progress of the instant rearrangement project is as follows.
1) On January 28, 2014, the authorization and public notice of a project implementation plan (G 2, 2020), on March 13, 2020, the authorization and public notice of a management and disposal plan (H in the Government’s public notice)
C. The Defendants were the owners or lessees of each Defendant’s real estate indicated in Section B, “Indication of the real estate to be delivered to each Defendant.” The Defendants occupied each of the said real estate.
(d)
On May 11, 2020, the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Expropriation Committee rendered a ruling of expropriation on June 25, 2020 with respect to each of the real estate of Defendant E and C listed in the attached Table B “Indication of the real estate to be delivered to each of the Defendant by Defendant” (hereinafter “decision of expropriation”) on the commencement date of expropriation, and on July 13, 2020, made a ruling of expropriation with respect to Defendant D on August 27, 2020 and KRW 4,000,000 (hereinafter “decision of expropriation”) with respect to the commencement date of expropriation.
(d)
1) On June 18, 2020, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 380,837,570 of the loss compensation prescribed in the first expropriation ruling of the instant case (No. 3712 of the Speaker's District Court Decision 2020), and on the same day, deposited KRW 359,679,950 of the loss compensation prescribed in the first expropriation ruling of the instant case with Defendant C as a person who was a person who was a public agent (No. 3708 of the Speaker's District Court Decision 2020) (No. 3708) on November 27, 2020, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 200, KRW 22,962,172 with Defendant E as a person who was a public consignee, and deposited KRW 380,000,000 as a deposit, KRW 25,000 (No. 25,000).