A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 02:30 on July 25, 2017 to 03:44 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was divided into the trade name “D” operated by the victim C in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si; (b) on the ground that female employees do not properly engage in a timely trial from their side despite the order of alcohol, and (c) took part in a set of vision to the customers on the next table, who were on the next table.

In addition, it caused other customers who drink in the above-mentioned shop by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, such as passing a large noise to the employees including the victim, and caused them to drink in the shop.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's drinking house operation by force.

2. On July 25, 2017, the Defendant for violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was under the influence of alcohol and without any special reason, on the part of the police officers working for the said district while being voluntarily accompanied due to the same suspicion as that of the preceding paragraph, at the 40 police squad in the Blue-si of Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do on July 25, 2017; and (b) was under the influence of alcohol.

Other police officers take a bath due to gueste such as pump.

“One-day treatment” and “one-day treatment” respectively.

“.....” and “.... f.b. f.b. v. bitch:

“A person who commits a disturbance with a large noise for about two hours, etc.” was unable to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. In full view of the investigation report, investigation report ( image taken by a police officer in a Handphone at the seat of a suspect), investigation report (a video attachment in the seat of a public office in the seat of a suspect), and investigation report (a video attachment in the seat of a public office) / (a) the defendant denies the obstruction of business, but in full view of the witness C’s consistent statement and the police officer’s investigation report sent to the site at the time, it is recognized that the defendant committed the same act as the facts charged and such act constitutes a crime of interference

Therefore, it is true.