1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasons why the court of first instance cited this case are as follows: “A disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure on July 21, 2015 (from July 22, 2015 to January 21, 2016) against the Plaintiff; “A disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure on a six-month basis and finally extend the period of prohibition of departure from February 27, 2017 to July 21, 2017,” and “a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea from January 22, 2017 to July 21, 2017, 200” under the main sentence of Article 10 of the Civil Procedure Act does not appear to be “20,” “5,” “from July 21, 2015 to July 21, 201,” and the reasons why the Plaintiff did not appear to be accompanied by “D 10 to July 21, 2017,” and “No 205,” from D 1.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim that was changed in exchange at the trial is without merit, and it is dismissed as per Disposition.