logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.03.14 2018고단2714
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is indicated in the 40 bill of indictment for the “E” game machine in the name of “D Game Center” in the name of “D Game Center C and the first floor of Chungcheongbuk-gun C and the first floor, but this appears to have been erroneous. As such, it is corrected as above. Defendant B is an employee who is in charge of the duties of the said game hall by the birth of Defendant A.

The Defendants confirmed the game points acquired by customers in the above game site through a e-mail card, and operated the game site by exchanging in cash the amount calculated by deducting 10% of the points from the service fees to the customers. When Defendant A informed the customers who want to be exchanged to Defendant B, Defendant B provided the game points by exchanging the game points.

From March 22, 2018 to March 27, 2018, the Defendants completed the “E” game installed in the said game room, brought a e-mail card used by customers who wish to exchange, and Defendant A confirmed the game points through the e-mail card box, Defendant A entered the corresponding amount in the series, affixed a cash storage stamp, affixed a seal on the cash storage stamp, affixed his signature to the customers, and directed them to exchange the money to Defendant B waiting on the outside of the said game room, and Defendant B exchanged in cash the amount obtained by deducting 10% of the fee for exchange from the amount of cash storage certificate written by the customers who wish to exchange.

As a result, the defendants jointly carried on the exchange of game scores, which are tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products, and let customers do gambling and other speculative acts using game products, or left customers to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. An explanatory note for game products subject to report on internal investigation;

arrow