The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant and the injured party B dealt with the instant facts charged by indecent act by compulsion between F and the Defendant-friendly D due to the establishment of the C High School and F, the owner of the E Reading room. A. There was a conflict between the indecent act by compulsion.

At around 13:30 on October 2, 2018, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, stating, “B had sexual intercourse with the President of the Reading Center,” and “B had a sexual intercourse with the President of the Reading Center,” although there was no fact that the victim had sexual intercourse with F,” which read “B had a sexual intercourse with F,” and “B had a sexual intercourse with the President of the Reading Center.”

B. On October 2018, 2018, the Defendant displayed that her friendship I exchanged with her victim at a place where it is unknown to the Gyeonggi-do Vice-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Yancheon-si”) and damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out the fact that “B is a son before the towing and attempted suicide.”

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.