Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Seized evidence Nos. 20 through 34, 51 through 53 from Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, with the nationality of Malaysia, have been aware of the intent to exempt the previous obligation when purchasing goods with a forged credit card from D, a bond company in Malaysia, or to distribute 10% of the price of goods with profits, and accordingly, had the intent to purchase high-priced handbags, etc. from Malaysia to sell them.

1. Violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act;

A. At around 12:20 on June 15, 2015, the Defendants, in collusion with the above D, presented the forged credit card delivered from D to the F hotel located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E as if it were a credit card duly issued, and paid 600,000 won of hotel accommodation expenses to the above hotel staff, and used the forged credit card more than 17 times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes (1).

B. The Defendants conspired with the above D, etc.

At the time, at the time, at the place, the credit card forged in the above manner as mentioned above was presented to the above hotel staff to settle the amount of 3,521,100 won including hotel accommodation charges, but the credit card was not used as an rejection of approval, and the credit card was intended to use forged credit card over 57 times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes (2), but was not intended due to refusal of approval by credit card.

3. Fraudulent and attempted fraud;

A. On June 15, 2015, in collusion with the above D, the Defendants were to use the F hotel located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul as forged credit cards that the Defendants intended to use, even if they were to purchase goods by using the forged credit cards, the Defendants paid 600,000 won of hotel accommodation charges by presenting the forged credit cards to the above hotel staff as if they were issued with no intent or ability to make a settlement later despite the fact that they had no intention or ability to pay the price, and then, the Defendants were to use the forged credit cards more than 17 times in total, such as in the attached list of crimes (1).