Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 176,885,748; and (b) 5% per annum from July 11, 2012 to December 9, 2014, to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The facts under the recognition of facts may be found to be either in dispute between the parties or in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) by reference to the whole purport of the pleadings.
The Plaintiff is a transaction in the form that the Defendant, who operated an importing company of the Italian Cheongba, Co., Ltd. from around 2009, purchased at a low price from D, a producer company of the Italian Cheongba (hereinafter “Esia”) located in Italian Republic of Korea (hereinafter “Esia”), and the Cheongba Poca Poca Poca Poca Pocan Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca Poca, reported the product list and Kabaca Poca Poca
From September 29, 2011, there was a trade with the Defendant on the product long-term supply contract with the Defendant for the transaction with the Sin PP.
B. 1) However, in around 2014, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the investigative agency against the Defendant on “the Defendant, by deceiving the Plaintiff, and by deceiving the Plaintiff,” and the Defendant filed a complaint with the investigative agency. (2) On October 31, 2011, the Defendant, even if the Defendant received the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment to the Italy company, did not have any idea to transfer the payment for the goods ordered by the Plaintiff to the Italy company. Even if a part of the payment was remitted to the Italy company, there was no idea to transfer the payment for the goods ordered by the Plaintiff to the Italy company. Since the Plaintiff did not have the Republic of Korea, even if the Plaintiff received the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the purchase of the Cheongbane, even though there was no intent or ability to supply the Plaintiff the payment of the Cheongbane to the Plaintiff.