1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 8, 1993, the Plaintiff entered the Gun and was discharged from the retirement age on March 31, 2015 while serving a so-called military life on June 11, 1993.

B. On April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation with L5-S1 (hereinafter “instant wounds”) on the application basis of the Defendant.

C. On August 13, 2015, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”) did not fall under the requirements prescribed in the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act”), and determined that the requirements prescribed in the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State were not satisfied when a soldier or policeman did not fall under the requirements prescribed in the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, and the requirements prescribed in the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”), and that the State’s defense and security or education and training without direct connection with the protection of the national’s life and property have become worse due to his/her failure to reach a rapid and rapid progress or beyond the point of origin.

On September 1, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant wound does not meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion.