1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The details of the disposition are the Plaintiff’s nationality.

On April 7, 2015, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea for a short-term visit of sojourn status (C-3) (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on April 7, 2015, and on June 7, 2016, the decision of June 2015, 2015, which was rendered on May 15, 2015: The fact that there is no dispute as to the grounds for rejection of the decision of February 24, 2017, which was decided on July 18, 2016, that there is no ground for rejection of the decision of February 24, 2017, which was decided on July 18, 2016, and written evidence Nos. 1, 2, B, and 1,

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is well-known.

The Republic of Korea is a national of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “Korea”).

The Plaintiff contributed to the radio broadcasting station from December 1, 2014 to 10 times, and made a statement to support the same-sex with two persons of friendship.

However, the organization opposing the same-sexism kills two friendlys who made a speech about same-sex support with the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea without being able to kill himself for the foregoing reasons.

As such, the Plaintiff is well-known.

On the other hand, refugee status should be recognized as a refugee because it is likely to be stuffed.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) The aforementioned evidence and the statement in the evidence No. 3 reveal the following circumstances revealed by adding the purport of the entire pleadings to the statement in the evidence No. 3, the Plaintiff’s opinion on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.