A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On October 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in the Daegu District Court’s Ansan Branch, and was sentenced to one year and one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the same support on August 9, 2016, and on January 25, 2018, the Seoul East East District Court sentenced the Defendant to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul East East District Court’s Seoul East District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 5, 2019.

【Criminal Facts” As above, while the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment not less than three times due to larceny, etc., and was in the repeated crime period from around 03:59 on February 23, 2019 to around 04:10 on the same day, the Defendant was found to have not corrected the sentence of the victim Hbera-cricking vehicle parked on the victim C, parked on the front of the net City City, B, and on the front of the F restaurant located in E, and was committed a attempted theft, without finding any property to be discovered, even though the Defendant failed to discover any property to be found inside the vehicle, such as a grobbbbbes, and a hbera-ket.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographs;

1. A report on investigation (related to the victim), a report on investigation (Attachment of CCTV-TV photographs on the surface of a motor vehicle in motion), and a report on investigation (limited to CCTV images for crime prevention at the time of committing a crime);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of repeated crimes, etc.), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning personal confinement;

1. Article 5-4 (5) 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 342, 329 and 35 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime committed;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation are as follows: (a) the Defendant has recognized all the instant crimes and reflects the mistake; (b) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crimes due to economic lack; and (c) the fact that all the instant crimes were committed toward attempted crimes is favorable to the Defendant.