A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 17, 2012, the Defendant posted a notice on May 17, 2012 on the Internet NAV 505 on the “Sgalthoon Gagthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogthon Dogth on 133,00, and made a false statement that he would deliver the cell phone to the victim by first depositing the money to the victim.

However, since the defendant did not have the above mobile phone, even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the above mobile phone to the victim.

The Defendant received KRW 133,00 from the victim as the price for a mobile phone on May 17, 2012 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (H) account in the name of the Defendant.

From that time to July 13, 2012, the Defendant connected to the above FF car page from Cheongdong-dong-dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si and received total of KRW 5,774,500 from 43 times in total as indicated in the list of crimes in the annexed crime

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

Around 17:40 on June 16, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would deliver the said Handphones to the victim’s victim’s J on the Internet Neneber FC bulletin board” opened by the victim’s J on the PC at the PC room where it is difficult to know the trade name in the Cheongdong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do. The Defendant posted a phone to the victim, and said that “I want to purchase the galthophone S2” and “I want to deliver the said Handphones to B. 1.50,000 won on the first hand.”

However, since the defendant did not have the above-mentioned mobile phone, even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the above mobile phone to the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is at least 21:30 on the same day from the victim.