logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.26 2014고합1316
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 20, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to protective custody for two years by imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court. On December 7, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months by imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court. On November 13, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to three years by imprisonment for the same crime at the Seoul Central District Court on September 7, 2012 and was sentenced to six times more.

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 12:00 on September 2, 2014, the Defendant, at the 24th floor office of the head office of Mez and fire in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 382, stolen 50,000 won in cash within the handbags owned by the victim D, and 10,000 won in cash within the handbags owned by the victim E, and 10,000 won in cash within the handbags of handbags owned by the victim E, and stolen 1,00,000 won in food gift certificates of KRW 1,50,000 in cash.

2. On October 21, 2014, at around 12:12, 2012, the Defendant used the gap in the victim G, H, I, I, and J’s 23th floor office of the building F in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and used the gap in which the victim G, H, I, I, and J used the gap in order to carry out a scambbrity, and KRW 150,000 in cash owned by the victim G on his book; KRW 50,000 in cash within the bank owned by the victim H; USD 10,000 in cash within the bank owned by the victim I; USD 10,00 in cash, USD 10 in Chinese currency, USD 50,00 in Chinese currency, KRW 1,50,00 in Scam gift certificates, KRW 40,00 in cash within the victim J, and KRW 400,00 in cash within the victim J’s market price, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victims' property two times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of J, H, I, G, D, and E;

1. Each CCTV screen;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow