1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff sought a refund of deposit and payment of property damage, necessary expenses, and consolation money to the Defendant. The court of first instance accepted the refund of deposit and the claim of necessary expenses, and partly accepted the claim of consolation money, and dismissed the claim of compensation for property damage caused by the boiler leakage.

As to this, the Defendant appealed against the necessary cost claim and the part accepting the claim of consolation money, and the Plaintiff appealed against the part dismissing the claim of consolation money and part of the claim of compensation for property damage caused by boiler leakage.

Therefore, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the plaintiff's appeal among the necessary expenses, the claim for consolation money and the claim for property damage caused by boiler leakage.

2. Determination as to the claim of damages, necessary expenses, and solatium

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the boiler pipe leakages of the boiler pipes of the building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) leased by the Defendant, but the Defendant neglected to repair his duty, thereby causing property damage equivalent to KRW 720,00 in total as the Defendant could not be used due to inundation, and the amount of “radiophones” equivalent to KRW 300,000, and KRW 1,100,000, and KRW 200,000 in total as the Plaintiff was the director before the expiration of the lease term, and the Plaintiff incurred property damage equivalent to KRW 1,30,000 in total, which was the sum of KRW 1,30,000, and KRW 1,200,000, and KRW 3,000 needed to repair the boiler pipe pipes, and KRW 5,000,000 as the Defendant was suffering from mental distress.

With respect to property damages under the above paragraph (1) in the first instance court, the Plaintiff alleged that the computer monitors equivalent to the total amount of KRW 1,060,000 have been damaged by cable broadcasting measuring instruments, wire and wireless phone, safety belt, multi-tamper, promotional appliances, electric lights and light lights, electric lights and light lights, etc., but it has reached the first instance trial.