1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,382,50 and the annual rate of KRW 5% from May 24, 2012 to October 28, 2015, and the following.

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

The company is one company substantially operated by C, and the defendant has been engaged in the overall management of the design, gold and official duties of the plaintiff company from October 2003 to June 25, 2012.

The defendant was delegated by the plaintiff company to display advertising materials to its subordinate companies and pay the price. Thus, the defendant violated the duty of due process to obtain a tax invoice of actual transaction amount from its subordinate companies and to have the plaintiff company pay only the actual transaction price. On January 2, 2008, the defendant issued a false tax invoice from the representative E producing outdoor advertisements around January 2, 2008, and made the plaintiff company pay 16,357,000 won more than the actual transaction price. After receiving again five million won from the defendant bank in the defendant's name from January 2, 2008 to April 16, 201 in the same manner as the remittance of KRW 16,357,00 from 00 to 16,000 won in the defendant's bank account number of 20: 30,000 won in the defendant's new account number of 20,000 won, such as attached Table 1-10,000 won in the defendant's bank account number of 2.

In addition, the defendant violated his duty of care to use the BC corporate card under the name of the plaintiff company only for the purpose related to the plaintiff company's business, and therefore, the defendant is an individual sports product equivalent to 320,000 won with the above corporate card from the mining distribution transmission point of Songpa-gu Seoul around February 18, 2012.