Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2018, at 41:37, the Defendant expressed D’s desire to read “chronch, farch, farch farch, farch farch, farch farch, farch farch, farch farch farch, farch farch farch, farch farch farch, farch farch farch farch farch farch, farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farch farb,” among the circumstances where

Accordingly, the defendant insultingly abused Do, and assaulted police officers, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Statement of reported cases and statement of reported cases, respectively;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to partially close a dynamic image;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. An unfavorable circumstance for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A favorable circumstance in which the Defendant’s police officers did not have the degree of assault against the instant crime of obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) the Defendant deposited KRW 700,000 to recover damage of police officers; (b) the police officers did not want the Defendant’s punishment; (c) the Defendant did not have any history of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties; and (d) there was only the history of having been punished by a fine on one occasion due to the crime of obstruction of official duties; and (c) the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, including the circumstances after the crime

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around April 17, 2018; (b) around 21:37.