beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
Defendant
B. The summary of the judgment on Defendant B is not known to the public.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Jung-gu District Court on December 29, 2009 and on May 21, 2010, Defendant A was released on September 30, 2010 during the execution of the sentence, and the term of the punishment was terminated on October 21, 2010. On February 4, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for an uncomfortable crime at the Seoul High Court and the sentence was finalized on May 14, 2015.
[ criminal facts] Defendant A is bound by the case against which a complaint was filed during the course of the operation of the office as the representative attorney-at-law of Law Firm E, and the attorney's practice was suspended and the registration of Law Firm E was revoked, which was close to ordinary sense
On May 2009, the defendant agreed to operate a partnership business, and accordingly, the defendant maintained the office of the former law firm E in the form of a governmental branch office of the F of the law firm F he represents, but the office's fund management, etc. is separate from the principal office in F of the law firm F, and the defendant's wife H will be assigned to the law firm E, and the two law firms shall be entrusted with the progress of the past case accepted by the law firm E, and the defendant A will acquire 10% of the success fee to be received by the law firm E when he won the case.
However, even if Defendant A completed ownership preservation, etc. in the name of the State prior to detention, but actually recovered the ownership of the land, Defendant A planned the so-called Suwon Aircraft Noise incident claiming compensation for damages caused by noise damage by residents near the Air Force Airport, and incurred excessive expenses in the course of preparing for it and conducting the lawsuit. Defendant A was liable for an excessive amount of KRW 5 billion from around 2005 to around August 2006 for reasons such as excessive expenses. On the other hand, the said financial situation has deteriorated as much more than KRW 2 billion from around 2004 to around 2006.