logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.04.24 2013고정139
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. At around 21:00 on November 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) performed drinking together with the “E” member F, general secretary-general, and the Defendant’s personal card of the Defendant, who is the president of the group, within the Yan-gu, Yan-gu, Yandong-gu, Yan-gu, Yandong-gu, the Defendant: (b) had a dispute on the ground that the Defendant paid the meeting expenses by using the Defendant’s personal card; (c) on the ground that he paid the meeting expenses by using the Defendant’s personal card; (d) had a part of the victim’s left eye on one occasion; (d) had the victim flick-gu, flick-gu, Yan-gu; and (e) caused the victim’s injury, such as the hole of the left inside and outside

2. As to the judgment of this Court, the Defendant consistently denies the facts charged from the police to the court of law, and consistently denying G, such as the facts charged, from the police to the court of law, no fact exists in G.

In a criminal trial, the burden of proof for the facts constituting an offense prosecuted is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on evidence with probative value, which makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the interest of the defendant is to be judged.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2008Do10096 Decided June 25, 2009, etc.). Examining whether the Defendant inflicted an injury on G, among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, there exist two copies of the written diagnosis of injury as evidence supporting the facts charged of the instant case and two damaged parts photographs, and the witness F’s legal statement. As such, even if it can be proven that G suffered an injury with such content, the Defendant cannot be proven that he/she suffered an injury, and the witness F made a statement to the effect that it is not memory as to whether the Defendant was at the time of the instant trial because he/she had a large amount of alcohol, and that it is recognized that the Defendant was injured by G.

arrow