1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 10,674,960 as well as 5% per annum from September 18, 2018 to December 8, 2020.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendants are those who work in the 2nd floor clothing store in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D market as employees.

B. On October 4, 2018, the Defendants received a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 from Defendant B, and Defendant C received a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as well as a fine of KRW 1,50,000 on the following criminal facts (hereinafter “instant defamation”).

(Seoul Central District Court No. 2018 High Court Decision 201550). Defendant B sent a friendly relationship between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff for two years, but the relationship was based on which the Plaintiff had been reported, and the fact that it was based on the fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant F did not have a spactic relationship with the Plaintiff was not a spactic relationship with the Plaintiff, and that Defendant C and the Defendant F are aware of the spact relationship directly with the Plaintiff at the time of the Plaintiff’s arrival.

1) On March 19, 2018, the Defendants conspired with each other at their respective stores where they work in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D market, the fact that the Plaintiff and E are not in a badial relationship does not mean that the Plaintiff cannot make the Plaintiff know that they had no evidence to the effect that they were in a badial relationship. As a result, the Defendants expressed that the Plaintiff “I’t know about the contents stored in the Stockholm is proved by evidence anywhere.”

As a result, the Defendants, by allowing those working in neighboring stores and those passing through roads, damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly pointing false facts.

B. At around 12:30 of the same day, the Defendants conspired with each other to engage in a crypology at the same place as above, the Defendants stated that “Is the details of the leaflet to the effect that the Plaintiff is in a cryp relationship with E and Fypine, and that the cypology fypine fypine fypine fypine fypine fypine fypine.”

The defendants, therefore, have people working in neighboring stores and those passing through roads.