1. The Defendants refer to each of their respective joint and several appeals. The Defendants’ amounting to KRW 10,000,000 to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s amount from December 5, 2013 to December 5, 2014.

According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including a serial number), witness D, E, testimony of this court, KT, LT, L flus, and SK Telecom Co., Ltd.'s overall fact-finding results and arguments, the defendants were false to the purport that "the defendant C is a married couple, who is not the defendant Eul, and is in a bad faith relationship with the plaintiff, and there is an abortion created between the plaintiff and his family members." The defendant Eul demanded that the plaintiff and his family members take phone several times and sent text messages to the plaintiff, and the defendant Eul was liable for damages to the plaintiff's above defendant Eul's tort under the circumstances that the plaintiff's work-based public service center and passengers reported to the plaintiff's work-based public office and the defendant's family members, and the defendant Eul was not liable for damages to the plaintiff's above defendant Eul's tort under the circumstance that the plaintiff's above defendant Eul was not liable for damages to the plaintiff's above defendant Eul's family members, and the defendant Eul's above facts and the defendant Eul's family members were ordered as the above."

As to this, Defendant B asserted that Defendant C and the Plaintiff entered into an inhumane relationship with Defendant C, but the statement of Defendant C is almost the only evidence.