1. The defendant on October 195, 1995 with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 1, 1913, E, who had a domicile in the Gyeonggi-gun Group B, 260 and C 270 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), was under the circumstances of E, who had a domicile in Gwangju-gun, 1913.

B. As to the instant land, the Defendant completed each registration of initial ownership in accordance with the receipt No. 54323 of Oct. 5, 1995, which was received on Oct. 5, 1995.

C. The Plaintiff’s early 20 October 20, 1959, when he had his permanent domicile in the Gyeonggi-gun F, died on the deceased on October 20, 1959, and accordingly, G succeeded to the Do H’s property independently. As G died on November 20, 1974, the Plaintiff and I, J, K, and L were jointly succeeded to the Plaintiff’s children’s property.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 10, purport of whole pleading

2. Determination

A. The same facts are acknowledged as seen earlier, in determining the cause of the claim, between the title holder of the assessment of the land in this case and the Plaintiff’s title E, the fleet of the Plaintiff.

Meanwhile, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence evidence Nos. 11 and evidence Nos. 16 and evidence Nos. 16, the address of the title holder of the land of this case was Gyeonggi-gun as of October 1, 1913. The fact that D and M were combined with the administrative district around 1914, which was later changed to N and changed to N due to the reorganization of administrative district around October 1, 1914, and the plaintiff's assistant Eul was under his own name as to the 10th 7th Y of Gyeonggi-gun-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, the adjacent to the land of this case, and accordingly, it is recognized that E grandchildren and the plaintiff's punishment completed registration of preservation of ownership on June 8, 1970 pursuant to the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Forest and Forest Land. At the time of the circumstance of the land of this case, it does not seem to have any circumstance that the title holder of Gyeonggi-gun E exists.

In light of these circumstances, the assessment titleholder and the Plaintiff of the instant land.