1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 24, 2012, the Plaintiff was working as a member of the office of office of the Gyeongman Regional Administration B, and was faced with an occupational accident on the part of the vehicle changing course while getting on and off the Obaba (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On December 12, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant had caused or deteriorated the “definite base, soft base,” and the “scinary signboard escape certificate No. 4-5 of the Mestal Year No. 6-7 of the Mestal Year (hereinafter “the instant injury”)” due to the instant accident, and applied for medical treatment for official duties. However, on January 31, 2013, the Defendant rejected the instant injury portion on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation with the instant accident.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [Ground for recognition] A, A, 2, 5, and 1

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. Inasmuch as the instant injury and disease occurred due to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the instant disposition based on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) The recognition of facts of recognition (1) medical care for the 2001 cage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage 205: 11 pum fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage f.