1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From January 18, 2005 to October 10, 2007, the Plaintiff was engaged in water treatment assistance work from C Council members (two years and nine months) and was engaged in water treatment and nursing assistance work from B Council members from October 11, 2007 to June 30, 2010 (two years and eight months).

B. On August 12, 2009, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “hyebrate, bones, or any other side signboard disability accompanied by the nephal ppuri disease certificate,” and was treated as physical therapy, and was discharged on January 6, 2011, which was after B’s retirement from the hospital.

4. In two times on December 29, 200, E Hospital received the E Hospital’s 4-5 pact of escape, and the Embrates and vertebrates were administered on December 24, 201 at the same hospital on December 24, 201.

C. On November 5, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant by asserting that the nuclear escape symptoms (No. 4-5, No. 5, No. 5, No. 1, No. 1, hereinafter “instant injury and disease”) occurred due to continuous tasks, such as supporting patients in the care service of nursing at the BD Council members, creating a cumulative scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

On December 6, 2012, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for medical care on the ground that, considering the results of deliberation by the Gwangju Occupational Disease Determination Committee, “The proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the injury and disease is not acknowledged, since it is insufficient to regard the instant injury and disease as an essential task to be caused at the time of considering the work attitude, strength, etc., the Defendant did not accept the Plaintiff’s application for medical care on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the injury and disease, considering the results of deliberation by the Gwangju Occupational Disease Determination Committee, the Plaintiff’s work performance, past medical history, etc.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) e.

The plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but on February 7, 2013, considered the plaintiff's work attitude and business strength.