logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.10.02 2017가단114239
건물등철거
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 21, 201, the Plaintiffs are the owners who acquired 1/2 shares of each of the ownership of a multi-household house with the 6-story reinforced concrete structure in Songpa-gu Seoul (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Housing”) on the ground of 219.9m2, Songpa-gu Seoul, 201, and reside in the Plaintiff’s Housing G.

B. On June 9, 2016, the Defendants acquired the ownership of a five-story multi-household house (hereinafter “Defendant’s housing”) of H large 220.5 square meters ground reinforced concrete structure adjacent to the southwest direction of the Plaintiff’s housing (hereinafter “Defendant’s housing”) with each 1/2 equity share, and the said owner had three-story buildings in the same place before constructing the Defendant’s housing.

다. 피고 C는 2015. 11. 14. 피고 주택 신축공사에 착공하여 2016. 5. 2.경 사용승인을 받은 후 관할관청의 허가를 받지 않은 채 샌드위치 패널 등을 이용하여 피고 주택의 별지1 도면 표시 ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㄱ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 (가)부분 29.3㎡ 및 별지2 도면 표시 ㅅ, ㅇ, ㅈ, ㅊ, ㅋ, ㅌ, ㅅ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 (나)부분 36.7㎡에 알루미늄제 기둥 및 샌드위치 패널을 이용하여 4층 I호, 5층 G호의 베란다 부분을 증축하고, 원고 주택에 인접하여 불법 축조한 외벽에 큰 창문을 내는 공사를 하여 같은 해

7. The horse warning was completed.

(hereinafter “instant extension”). D.

Plaintiff

Housing and defendant housing shall be located in the Class-II general residential area (not more than seven stories) as prescribed by the National Land Planning and Utilization Act.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 through 4, 6 through 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that Defendant C constructed and illegally expanded the defendant's housing, thereby infringing the plaintiffs' right to enjoy sunshine, which is the owners of the plaintiff's Housing J-ho and G, and the plaintiffs' right to enjoy sunshine was infringed on by blocking the view of the plaintiff's Housing G-ho, making a significant decline in the astronomical rate and the loss of opening.

arrow