1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 2,91,600 to Plaintiff E, and KRW 900,00 to Plaintiff D, and KRW 2,305,740 to Plaintiff G, and each of them.

1. Basic facts

A. The owner of the Plaintiff A and the 502-owner of the Plaintiff B and the 5th 503-owner of the Plaintiff C and the 3th 304-owner of the Plaintiff E and the 2nd 2nd 2nd 204-owner of the Plaintiff, the 5th 5th 502-owner of the 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 50

Plaintiff

On June 1, 2014, with respect to 404 housing units, the registration of ownership transfer under the name of Plaintiff D was completed on the ground of sale on June 1, 2014, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of the trust on July 4, 2014.

B. Although the instant building was originally built on the ground located on the same side of the building in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendants purchased the said land around August 2015 and completed the construction after obtaining a construction permit to construct multi-household houses (the height of which is 16.6m; hereinafter “Defendant building”) of the six-story size on the said ground, and completed the registration of preservation of ownership by obtaining approval for use on or around March 2016.

The status of placement of the building before and after the construction of the defendant building is as follows:

Facts that there is no dispute after new construction before the new construction (based for recognition), Gap evidence 1 through 8, Eul evidence 1 through 3, the result of this court's entrustment of appraisal to appraiser M, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendants asserted that they newly built a multi-household house of 6 meters above the ground from the Plaintiff’s housing in which the Plaintiffs were residing, thereby infringing the Plaintiffs’ right to sunshine, view, and view.

As a result, the remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff G, who is the owner of each of the corresponding sections of the plaintiff's house, suffered property damage equivalent to the decline of the market price of each partitioned building.

In addition, due to the above infringement such as the right to sunshine, the remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff C residing in each partitioned part of the plaintiff's house suffered mental suffering, and the defendants are stated in the attached Table as compensation for damages to the plaintiffs.