A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who, around March 17, 2003, was employed by C in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as the representative director and worked as the representative of the business division from July 2006 to July 2006 and was engaged in household sales and collection affairs of the above company until he retires on June 30, 2007 after promotion of the director of the division around August 2006.

1. Occupational embezzlement;

A. A. Around April 20, 2007, the Defendant, who committed the crime of April 20, 2007, provided that around April 20, the Defendant supplied G in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F and embezzled the amount of KRW 1,593,350 as household price, and collected KRW 1,593,350 as household price, and embezzled it by arbitrarily consuming it to the Internet gambling, etc. around that time.

B. Around May 1, 2007, the Defendant: (a) supplied an officer’s book to I located in H in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) collected KRW 8,250,000 from household rent; and (c) embezzled it by arbitrarily consuming it to the Internet gambling around that time.

C. Around May 23, 2007, the Defendant supplied a household to J in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and collected KRW 2,645,830 from the household price, and embezzled it by arbitrarily consuming it to the Internet gambling around that time.

2. On January 18, 2007, the Defendant in occupational breach of trust, in cases where he received an order from the J in Gangnam-gu Seoul, to supply a household by another company because the Defendant did not supply or estimate the victim (E)E products working for the Defendant, and thus, he reported it to C, the representative director of the victim, and despite the existence of an occupational duty to deal with the business, the Defendant in breach of the said duty, caused the said K to obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 1,435,500 equivalent to the above household supply price of 15% of the above household supply price to the said K and to obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 1,435,500 of the above household supply price to the said K and incurred substantial damages to the victim.