The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed during the period of repeated crimes of the same kind in the market, and that there was a record of criminal punishment for 11 times due to the same crime of violence (three times of the sentence among them), etc. is disadvantageous.

However, there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the fact that the victim C who was aware of the usual knowledge and the fact that it appears to have caused contingent crimes of this case, and that the victims do not want punishment against the defendant by agreement with the victims.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

The ground for appeal is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.