The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The value of the damaged property is a small amount, the degree of injury is easy, and the crime is against the good condition.

However, the fact that the victims have not recovered from damage, the victims have been punished for the defendant, and the victims have committed the crime of this case again before the expiration of the remaining suspension period of execution after being sentenced to a fine by means of the reduction of violent crime during the suspension period of execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime.

In addition, considering the motive and background of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.