logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.12.07 2017고단2864
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on July 30, 2014 at the District Court on July 22, 2014 due to the charge of forging private documents, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 30, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 27, 2012, Defendant A, a Chinese national residing in the capacity of visiting employment (H-2) around February 27, 2012, filed an application for a change of status of stay to the overseas Korean (F-4) at the location of the Incheon Immigration Control Office, around December 27, 2013, but was required by the public official in charge to submit criminal sanctions for attempted crimes (the so-called “non-criminal certificate”).

Defendant

A had been sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for robbery in the past in the Si court of Pacific of China, and the Chinese authority failed to obtain the certificate of attempted criminal punishment from the Chinese authority, and requested the defendant B, who is a woman, to find the bromoer, to request the forgery of the certificate of attempted criminal punishment. On January 9, 2014, the defendant B found the defendant C, who operated the "F travelman" on the member E and the first floor of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and requested the receipt of a forged and forged certificate of criminal punishment for attempted criminal punishment against the defendant A. The defendant C received the fee of three million won and accepted the above request and delivered the above request to the defendant D.

Accordingly, Defendant D contacted with an infinite in China and requested the forgery of criminal sanctions against Defendant A, and the above forged business operator stated Defendant A's personal information in the name of "G" in the name of "infinite criminal sanctions" in the Chinese Buddhist land in February 2014, and affixed a seal to the name of the country of public security when the finite mixedness in China.

As a result, the Defendants forged the criminal sanctions against attempted crimes under the name of the State of Public Security in the event of the marriage of Chinese route, which is a private document on the proof of facts, in collusion with the above misappropriation business operator, for the purpose of uttering in sequence.

2. Exercising the above investigation document;

arrow