logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.15 2019나35307
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 29, 2016, the Plaintiff was prosecuted under the name of a crime such as rape (Seoul Central District Court 2016 High Court 2016Gohap1371). Of the facts charged, the following are included in the charges.

On June 17, 2015, at around 19:00, the Defendant: (a) went to the victim E (the age of 21) who is one male customer of sexual traffic (the age of 21) known to the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as stated in the above paragraph (1) on the Internet hosting site to seek male customers who will purchase through the Internet, and (b) the victim complained of “Afac”, and (c) caused the victim to be aware that he was in possession of ethyl psychotropic drugs, which contain ethyl psychotropic drugs, and psychotropic drugs, and psychotropic drugs, without explaining the type and efficacy of drugs to the victim; (b) the victim lost the victim’s faces face by inserting the victim’s ethyl 2 and an Afaculecing 1.

As a result, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs, roding, and raped the victim after leaving the victim in a state of mental disorder.

B. On February 2, 2017, the Plaintiff applied for a decision of professional examiners to participate in the above criminal trial, and the first trial court accepted it and ordered the Defendant to submit a written opinion of professional examiners.

C. On May 14, 2017, the Defendant submitted a written opinion on professional examiners to the full bench. The written opinion contains the following contents:

In particular, a drug, used in this case, is a drug that causes the loss of memory, even among the benda dysp farms.

arrow