No. 1, 3, 5, and 6 of the judgment of the defendant and No. 2 of the judgment of the court with respect to the crime No. 2-A, No. 4 of the judgment of the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On December 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for fraud and one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 7, 2014.

1. On August 1, 2014, Defendant 854 discussed the following: “D” restaurant located in Gyeonggicheon-gun C; “F, the representative of the victim E clan to which the Defendant belongs as a member’s auditor; “A clan house located in Gyeonggi-gun G, which the victim completed around November 2013, was not permitted to construct; and on July 2014, Defendant 2014, the fact that the Defendant received an order to recover the mountainous district from his/her mountainous district due to an illegal diversion of the mountainous district from the Seocheon-gun Military Office on the ground that he/she was ordered to recover the mountainous district.

In fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to resolve the legal problems, such as the permission for the construction of the above charnel house, and even if he received money from the injured person as a matter of the legal problems related to the above charnel house, he did not use it in connection with the above charnel house, but the Defendant stated that the above F F F F F F F F F, etc., “it is necessary to persuade some of the members who filed a civil petition due to the above charnel house, and to solve the legal problems related to the charnel through public officials who want to do so in the office of the Dongcheon-gun-gun Office,” and that it received KRW 7,00,000 from the above F, under the name of the victim, through the Saemaul treasury account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, from the

9. Before December 25, 200, a total of 80,474,000 won was remitted for the purpose of solving the problems related to charnels through the same method, such as the list of crimes (1) in attached Form 1 in the same manner.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim and was given property from the victim.

2. 2017 Highest 1029

A. The Defendant, who forged a private document and carried out the above investigation document, proposed that H, an operator of the restaurant in which he was usual, will be aware of the construction work at the construction site of the Incheon International Airport, and is an opportunity to receive a resident registration certificate from H.