logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.23 2019고합555
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, the Defendant treated marijuana as follows:

1. On December 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) requested a Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style Chinese-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-

Accordingly, in collusion with C, the Defendant imported four marijuana mileages in the United States.

2. Smoking marijuana;

A. On September 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) while traveling the Malaysia Food (PUCHNG) regionless valleys around September 12, 2018, the Defendant smoked tobacco by collecting a cryp “mari-made tobacco” in the name of the Netherlands origin from a man who is not registered in the Netherlands’s country; and (b) attaching a flab with a flab, as the Defendant smoked.

B. On January 1, 2019, the Defendant smoked tobacco as smoking with a word “mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-mari-Man tobacco” in Paris around the new wall.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each seizure report and each report on results of analysis, and each report on narcotics appraisal;

1. Each investigation report (related to the calculation of additional collection charges) and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the monthly trend of narcotics;

1. Article 58 (1) 5 of the relevant Act and Articles 3 and 7 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc. (the import of marijuana and the choice of limited imprisonment), Article 61 (1) 4 (a) and subparagraph 10 (a) of Article 3 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the point of smoking marijuana and the choice of imprisonment) concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow