A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violence;

A. On September 26, 2013, at around 03:32, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B, the Defendant was assaulted by the victim’s scam with the victim’s scam on one occasion at the “D” restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the reason that the Defendant was committing the crime against the victim B, E, who was working for the victim B (32 years of age).

B. At around 02:30 on October 4, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim F, on the ground that the victim F (the 30-year-old-old-old-gu Seoul), was unfluened in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul G road, and was urged by the victim to stop in front of the victim’s Hhhhhhhn-low-low-car, booming the victim, and interfered with the progress of the said vehicle. On the other hand, the Defendant flusing the victim’s face, flading the victim’s head, flading the victim’s head, flading the victim’s head, flading the victim’s head, and flading the victim’s am once.

2. On October 4, 2013, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 02:55, on the road in front of the police box of the Gangnam-gu Police Station in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and (b) at

For the reason that he assaulted F, such as the statement in the port, he saw the above K as “hicker, kicker,” and assaulted the said K at one time as a drink during the process of being arrested and carried out by the police officer assigned to the above police box, such as displaying the above K with drinking to the said K.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of the police officer's order, crime prevention and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of some of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement to B, F, and K;

1. Application of L’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for the crime concerned;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows.