The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The judgment below

Article 229, Article 225, and Article 30 of the Criminal Code shall apply mutatis mutandis to the 20 conduct on the 3rd side.

The gist of the defendant's appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (4 months of imprisonment, 1 year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

However, considering all of the circumstances, such as the defendant's primary crime without previous conviction, who served as a fire-fighting official for more than 20 years, and has served for the people in depth of each of the crimes in this case, even though the defendant was in a position to observe laws and regulations and faithfully perform his duties, he was aware of such duties, and committed each of the crimes in this case, which are the conditions for the sentencing of the punishment in this case, including the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case, which are the conditions for the punishment in this case, by forging official documents under the name of the head of the agency, and making the official seal of the agency arbitrarily upon request by the civil petitioner who was aware of the status to observe laws and regulations and faithfully perform his duties. Thus, the above assertion is without merit, since the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and "Articles 229, 225, 225, and 30 of the Criminal Act" in Article 229, 225, 30, 34 (1), and 31 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.