1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

The defendant is a doctor operating the F Dental Hospital in Seo-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter "the instant hospital"), Seo-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter "the deceased"), and the deceased G (hereinafter "the deceased") is a person who has undergone an crym operation at the instant hospital from February 13, 2013 to June 20, 2013.

Plaintiff

A The husband, the plaintiff B, and C are the children of the deceased.

On February 12, 2013, the Deceased, such as the Defendant’s treatment process, was transferred to the instant hospital for the purpose of performing a cryprym operation.

The Defendant became aware in the process of the pre-stigious examination that the Deceased was in the process of taking the scopic disease due to the heart and the Ascopic disease.

Accordingly, the Defendant directed that the deceased stop using the scopic clothes (the Defendant, around February 25, 2013, was given the view that the operation would be possible if the scopic clothes were suspended from the medical staff of the G-university Hospital that treated the deceased) on February 12, 2013, two of the deceased’s dental services on February 19, 2013, four of the dental services on March 6, 2013, four of the dental services on March 6, 2013, four of the dental services on March 15, 2013, and four of the dental services on March 19, 2013.

On April 2, 2013, the Deceased was admitted to the Defendant Hospital for the temporary coloning of 2013. On April 11, 2013, the Deceased received temporary coloning operations from the Defendant on April 11, 2013, and applied for the Defendant Hospital on May 31, 2013.

On June 24, 2013, the Deceased died as a sudden stop by the heart on June 10, 2013.

【In the absence of dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul’s evidence Nos. 2 (including partial number of evidence), the result of the examination commission to the president of the Korean Dental Association, and the president of the Korean Medical Association, as a result of the overall argument, the purport of the arguments as well as the judgment of the plaintiffs’ assertion is that the deceased is the heart or the Gap-board disease who takes a part of the Aminium, so it is unreasonable that the defendant neglected to take care of the deceased, and neglected to take care of the deceased’s attention after taking an antibiotical agents, and neglected to take care of the deceased’s attention on the day he left the Defendant hospital.